Canada-listed Voyager Digital (TSX: VOYG) confirmed on Wednesday that several state regulators in the United States are scrutinizing its services for offering interest-bearing cryptocurrency accounts.
According to the cryptocurrency company, it has already received or is expecting to get cease and desist orders from the financial supervisors of Indiana, Kentucky, New Jersey and Oklahoma. Additionally, the state securities division of Alabama, Texas, Vermont and Washington have issued show-cause orders to the company.
All of these orders are asserting that Voyager Earn Accounts fall under the category of security and investment contracts, thus violating the state securities regulations.
However, Voyager is convinced that its offerings are not securities and is intending to defend its position. “Voyager supports appropriate regulation
Regulation
Like any other industry with a high net worth, the financial services industry is tightly regulated to help curb illicit behavior and manipulation. Each asset class has its own set of protocols put in place to combat their respective forms of abuse.In the foreign exchange space, regulation is assumed by authorities in multiple jurisdictions, though ultimately lacking a binding international order. Who are the Industry’s Leading Regulators?Regulators such as the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the US’ Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Australian Security and Investment Commission (ASIC), and the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) are the most widely dealt with authorities in the FX industry.In its most basic sense, regulators help ensure the filing of reports and transmission of data to help police and monitor activity by brokers. Regulators also serve as a countermeasure against market abuse and malpractice by brokers. Brokers adhering to a list of mandated rules are authorized to provide investment activities in a given jurisdiction. By extension, many unauthorized or unregulated entities will also seek to market their services illegally or function as a clone of a regulated operation.Regulators are essential in snuffing out these scam operations as they prevent significant risks for investors.In terms of reporting, brokers are also required to regularly file reports about their clients’ positions to the relevant regulatory authorities. The most-recent regulatory push in the aftermath of the Great Financial Crisis of 2008 has delivered a material shift in the regulatory reporting landscape.Brokers typically outsource the reporting to other companies which are connecting the trade repositories used by regulators to the broker’s systems and are handling this crucial element of compliance.Beyond FX, regulators help reconcile all matters of oversight and are watchdogs for each industry. With ever-changing information and protocols, regulators are always working to promote fairer and more transparent business practices from brokers or exchanges.
Like any other industry with a high net worth, the financial services industry is tightly regulated to help curb illicit behavior and manipulation. Each asset class has its own set of protocols put in place to combat their respective forms of abuse.In the foreign exchange space, regulation is assumed by authorities in multiple jurisdictions, though ultimately lacking a binding international order. Who are the Industry’s Leading Regulators?Regulators such as the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the US’ Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Australian Security and Investment Commission (ASIC), and the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) are the most widely dealt with authorities in the FX industry.In its most basic sense, regulators help ensure the filing of reports and transmission of data to help police and monitor activity by brokers. Regulators also serve as a countermeasure against market abuse and malpractice by brokers. Brokers adhering to a list of mandated rules are authorized to provide investment activities in a given jurisdiction. By extension, many unauthorized or unregulated entities will also seek to market their services illegally or function as a clone of a regulated operation.Regulators are essential in snuffing out these scam operations as they prevent significant risks for investors.In terms of reporting, brokers are also required to regularly file reports about their clients’ positions to the relevant regulatory authorities. The most-recent regulatory push in the aftermath of the Great Financial Crisis of 2008 has delivered a material shift in the regulatory reporting landscape.Brokers typically outsource the reporting to other companies which are connecting the trade repositories used by regulators to the broker’s systems and are handling this crucial element of compliance.Beyond FX, regulators help reconcile all matters of oversight and are watchdogs for each industry. With ever-changing information and protocols, regulators are always working to promote fairer and more transparent business practices from brokers or exchanges.
Read this Term and will do its best to demonstrate to these regulators that Voyager has complied with the law,” the company stated.
Though Voyager is still seeking further clarification on all of the regulatory orders, it pointed out that a few of them would prohibit it from offering interest-bearing crypto accounts, while three of them are seeking monetary penalties.
“It is Voyager’s expectation that most of these state orders will provide a transition period prior to becoming effective,” the company added.
US Regulators against Crypto Lending Platforms
The crackdown of the US state regulators against crypto lending
Crypto Lending
The process of lending cryptocurrency assets with an accrued interest rate and due date is known as crypto lending. The process of crypto lending often occurs through cryptocurrency exchanges or online lending platforms to connect borrowers to lenders. Lenders of crypto lending are comprised of institutional lenders, like hedge funds and asset managers, individual participants, or entities seeking to accrue interest. On the opposite end of the spectrum, borrowers of crypto lending include market makers, proprietary traders, investment managers, hedge funds, traders.These entities or individuals look to short the market, arbitrage-based traders, or entities who need to fulfill an obligation with another party. Different Types of Crypto LendingWhile the process of crypto lending is simply, there are four types of crypto lending practices that traders should familiarize themselves with.Companies, individuals, or entities who possess an excess of cryptocurrencies can earn additional cryptocurrencies through crypto lending. Crypto-to-crypto lending materializes in the form of a smart contract, where crypto lenders can earn interest for a specific period. Common cryptocurrencies that are lent include Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Altcoins. Two examples of crypto-to-crypto lending include Nuo and Coincheck. Moreover, margin lending is a new type of crypto lending, which enables lenders to fund varying cryptocurrencies to borrowers as opposed to a single crypto asset. Typically, lenders of margin lending fix their interest rate and contract duration while occurring over a centralized platform such as Nuo and Bitfinex. While less common, crypto-to-fiat lending occurs when individuals, businesses, or entities require cash. Cryptocurrencies are used as collateral while the lender receives a fiat return which generally is credited to a linked bank account. Finally, crypto-credit lending occurs when entities need capital. Opposed to peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, crypto-credit lending places less emphasis on credit history although this comes with a sacrifice of regulation.
The process of lending cryptocurrency assets with an accrued interest rate and due date is known as crypto lending. The process of crypto lending often occurs through cryptocurrency exchanges or online lending platforms to connect borrowers to lenders. Lenders of crypto lending are comprised of institutional lenders, like hedge funds and asset managers, individual participants, or entities seeking to accrue interest. On the opposite end of the spectrum, borrowers of crypto lending include market makers, proprietary traders, investment managers, hedge funds, traders.These entities or individuals look to short the market, arbitrage-based traders, or entities who need to fulfill an obligation with another party. Different Types of Crypto LendingWhile the process of crypto lending is simply, there are four types of crypto lending practices that traders should familiarize themselves with.Companies, individuals, or entities who possess an excess of cryptocurrencies can earn additional cryptocurrencies through crypto lending. Crypto-to-crypto lending materializes in the form of a smart contract, where crypto lenders can earn interest for a specific period. Common cryptocurrencies that are lent include Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Altcoins. Two examples of crypto-to-crypto lending include Nuo and Coincheck. Moreover, margin lending is a new type of crypto lending, which enables lenders to fund varying cryptocurrencies to borrowers as opposed to a single crypto asset. Typically, lenders of margin lending fix their interest rate and contract duration while occurring over a centralized platform such as Nuo and Bitfinex. While less common, crypto-to-fiat lending occurs when individuals, businesses, or entities require cash. Cryptocurrencies are used as collateral while the lender receives a fiat return which generally is credited to a linked bank account. Finally, crypto-credit lending occurs when entities need capital. Opposed to peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, crypto-credit lending places less emphasis on credit history although this comes with a sacrifice of regulation.
Read this Term platforms is not new. Before, several state regulators issued similar orders against popular platforms like BlockFi and Celsius, alleging violation of state laws.
An earlier media report even revealed that the US federal financial market supervisor, the Securities and Exchange Commission, is probing the offerings of several crypto companies, including Voyager Digital.
Furthermore, BlockFi became the first of these companies to settle with these federal and state regulators, paying $100 million and agreeing to several conditions like suspension of adding new US accounts.
Canada-listed Voyager Digital (TSX: VOYG) confirmed on Wednesday that several state regulators in the United States are scrutinizing its services for offering interest-bearing cryptocurrency accounts.
According to the cryptocurrency company, it has already received or is expecting to get cease and desist orders from the financial supervisors of Indiana, Kentucky, New Jersey and Oklahoma. Additionally, the state securities division of Alabama, Texas, Vermont and Washington have issued show-cause orders to the company.
All of these orders are asserting that Voyager Earn Accounts fall under the category of security and investment contracts, thus violating the state securities regulations.
However, Voyager is convinced that its offerings are not securities and is intending to defend its position. “Voyager supports appropriate regulation
Regulation
Like any other industry with a high net worth, the financial services industry is tightly regulated to help curb illicit behavior and manipulation. Each asset class has its own set of protocols put in place to combat their respective forms of abuse.In the foreign exchange space, regulation is assumed by authorities in multiple jurisdictions, though ultimately lacking a binding international order. Who are the Industry’s Leading Regulators?Regulators such as the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the US’ Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Australian Security and Investment Commission (ASIC), and the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) are the most widely dealt with authorities in the FX industry.In its most basic sense, regulators help ensure the filing of reports and transmission of data to help police and monitor activity by brokers. Regulators also serve as a countermeasure against market abuse and malpractice by brokers. Brokers adhering to a list of mandated rules are authorized to provide investment activities in a given jurisdiction. By extension, many unauthorized or unregulated entities will also seek to market their services illegally or function as a clone of a regulated operation.Regulators are essential in snuffing out these scam operations as they prevent significant risks for investors.In terms of reporting, brokers are also required to regularly file reports about their clients’ positions to the relevant regulatory authorities. The most-recent regulatory push in the aftermath of the Great Financial Crisis of 2008 has delivered a material shift in the regulatory reporting landscape.Brokers typically outsource the reporting to other companies which are connecting the trade repositories used by regulators to the broker’s systems and are handling this crucial element of compliance.Beyond FX, regulators help reconcile all matters of oversight and are watchdogs for each industry. With ever-changing information and protocols, regulators are always working to promote fairer and more transparent business practices from brokers or exchanges.
Like any other industry with a high net worth, the financial services industry is tightly regulated to help curb illicit behavior and manipulation. Each asset class has its own set of protocols put in place to combat their respective forms of abuse.In the foreign exchange space, regulation is assumed by authorities in multiple jurisdictions, though ultimately lacking a binding international order. Who are the Industry’s Leading Regulators?Regulators such as the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the US’ Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Australian Security and Investment Commission (ASIC), and the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) are the most widely dealt with authorities in the FX industry.In its most basic sense, regulators help ensure the filing of reports and transmission of data to help police and monitor activity by brokers. Regulators also serve as a countermeasure against market abuse and malpractice by brokers. Brokers adhering to a list of mandated rules are authorized to provide investment activities in a given jurisdiction. By extension, many unauthorized or unregulated entities will also seek to market their services illegally or function as a clone of a regulated operation.Regulators are essential in snuffing out these scam operations as they prevent significant risks for investors.In terms of reporting, brokers are also required to regularly file reports about their clients’ positions to the relevant regulatory authorities. The most-recent regulatory push in the aftermath of the Great Financial Crisis of 2008 has delivered a material shift in the regulatory reporting landscape.Brokers typically outsource the reporting to other companies which are connecting the trade repositories used by regulators to the broker’s systems and are handling this crucial element of compliance.Beyond FX, regulators help reconcile all matters of oversight and are watchdogs for each industry. With ever-changing information and protocols, regulators are always working to promote fairer and more transparent business practices from brokers or exchanges.
Read this Term and will do its best to demonstrate to these regulators that Voyager has complied with the law,” the company stated.
Though Voyager is still seeking further clarification on all of the regulatory orders, it pointed out that a few of them would prohibit it from offering interest-bearing crypto accounts, while three of them are seeking monetary penalties.
“It is Voyager’s expectation that most of these state orders will provide a transition period prior to becoming effective,” the company added.
US Regulators against Crypto Lending Platforms
The crackdown of the US state regulators against crypto lending
Crypto Lending
The process of lending cryptocurrency assets with an accrued interest rate and due date is known as crypto lending. The process of crypto lending often occurs through cryptocurrency exchanges or online lending platforms to connect borrowers to lenders. Lenders of crypto lending are comprised of institutional lenders, like hedge funds and asset managers, individual participants, or entities seeking to accrue interest. On the opposite end of the spectrum, borrowers of crypto lending include market makers, proprietary traders, investment managers, hedge funds, traders.These entities or individuals look to short the market, arbitrage-based traders, or entities who need to fulfill an obligation with another party. Different Types of Crypto LendingWhile the process of crypto lending is simply, there are four types of crypto lending practices that traders should familiarize themselves with.Companies, individuals, or entities who possess an excess of cryptocurrencies can earn additional cryptocurrencies through crypto lending. Crypto-to-crypto lending materializes in the form of a smart contract, where crypto lenders can earn interest for a specific period. Common cryptocurrencies that are lent include Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Altcoins. Two examples of crypto-to-crypto lending include Nuo and Coincheck. Moreover, margin lending is a new type of crypto lending, which enables lenders to fund varying cryptocurrencies to borrowers as opposed to a single crypto asset. Typically, lenders of margin lending fix their interest rate and contract duration while occurring over a centralized platform such as Nuo and Bitfinex. While less common, crypto-to-fiat lending occurs when individuals, businesses, or entities require cash. Cryptocurrencies are used as collateral while the lender receives a fiat return which generally is credited to a linked bank account. Finally, crypto-credit lending occurs when entities need capital. Opposed to peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, crypto-credit lending places less emphasis on credit history although this comes with a sacrifice of regulation.
The process of lending cryptocurrency assets with an accrued interest rate and due date is known as crypto lending. The process of crypto lending often occurs through cryptocurrency exchanges or online lending platforms to connect borrowers to lenders. Lenders of crypto lending are comprised of institutional lenders, like hedge funds and asset managers, individual participants, or entities seeking to accrue interest. On the opposite end of the spectrum, borrowers of crypto lending include market makers, proprietary traders, investment managers, hedge funds, traders.These entities or individuals look to short the market, arbitrage-based traders, or entities who need to fulfill an obligation with another party. Different Types of Crypto LendingWhile the process of crypto lending is simply, there are four types of crypto lending practices that traders should familiarize themselves with.Companies, individuals, or entities who possess an excess of cryptocurrencies can earn additional cryptocurrencies through crypto lending. Crypto-to-crypto lending materializes in the form of a smart contract, where crypto lenders can earn interest for a specific period. Common cryptocurrencies that are lent include Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Altcoins. Two examples of crypto-to-crypto lending include Nuo and Coincheck. Moreover, margin lending is a new type of crypto lending, which enables lenders to fund varying cryptocurrencies to borrowers as opposed to a single crypto asset. Typically, lenders of margin lending fix their interest rate and contract duration while occurring over a centralized platform such as Nuo and Bitfinex. While less common, crypto-to-fiat lending occurs when individuals, businesses, or entities require cash. Cryptocurrencies are used as collateral while the lender receives a fiat return which generally is credited to a linked bank account. Finally, crypto-credit lending occurs when entities need capital. Opposed to peer-to-peer (P2P) lending, crypto-credit lending places less emphasis on credit history although this comes with a sacrifice of regulation.
Read this Term platforms is not new. Before, several state regulators issued similar orders against popular platforms like BlockFi and Celsius, alleging violation of state laws.
An earlier media report even revealed that the US federal financial market supervisor, the Securities and Exchange Commission, is probing the offerings of several crypto companies, including Voyager Digital.
Furthermore, BlockFi became the first of these companies to settle with these federal and state regulators, paying $100 million and agreeing to several conditions like suspension of adding new US accounts.
English 